Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>,Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,"pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites
Date: 2004-05-12 21:03:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Tom Lane wrote:

> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > I would *love* to have the problem of so many users' groups that they
> > overlap.
> I agree with Josh.  We can sort it out if and when there's actually a
> conflict, but at the moment this argument seems pretty pointless.

I have to agree with Robert on this though ... a UG, at least what I think
is the defacto standard for it, is a group that gets together ... linking
to "PostgreSQL related web sites" is not for, or, at
least, shouldn't be ... a 'Related Sites' link off of,
yes ...

I'm not so much worried about micro-managing, but there should be *some*
criteria for inclusion, and I think monthly, schedualed meetings should be
a big one ...

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2004-05-12 21:15:41
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2004-05-12 20:54:35
Subject: Re: Status update on 'new' website, testing needed

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group