| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>, elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites |
| Date: | 2004-05-12 21:03:45 |
| Message-ID: | 20040512180133.W35531@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Wed, 12 May 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > I would *love* to have the problem of so many users' groups that they
> > overlap.
>
> I agree with Josh. We can sort it out if and when there's actually a
> conflict, but at the moment this argument seems pretty pointless.
I have to agree with Robert on this though ... a UG, at least what I think
is the defacto standard for it, is a group that gets together ... linking
to "PostgreSQL related web sites" is not for pug.postgresql.org, or, at
least, shouldn't be ... a 'Related Sites' link off of www.postgresql.org,
yes ...
I'm not so much worried about micro-managing, but there should be *some*
criteria for inclusion, and I think monthly, schedualed meetings should be
a big one ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2004-05-12 21:15:41 | Re: Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL Users' Group sites |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-05-12 20:54:35 | Re: Status update on 'new' website, testing needed |