Re: mingw regression test fixes

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Claudio Natoli wrote:
> > Peter, did you mean $host_platform by any chance... as originally
> > submitted? I see no use of $build_platform anywhere, and as committed
> > this plain fails.
>
> I meant that $build_platform would be better than `uname`, not that my
> word is to be taken blindly without testing. But...
>
> >
> > I don't see why there is any need for discussion over this. There are
> > 3 cases statements preceding this one, all of which use
> > $host_platform. The one immediately preceding it does the very same
> > thing for DIFFFLAGS!
>
> ... that is a very good argument for $host_platform as originally
> proposed.

OK, new code, back to original. :-)

case $host_platform in
*-*-mingw32*)
PWDFLAGS=-W;;
*)
PWDFLAGS=;;
esac

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073