Re: Plan for feature freeze?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Plan for feature freeze?
Date: 2004-05-01 15:36:38
Message-ID: 200405011536.i41FacN06333@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway wrote:
> On 30-Apr-04, at 8:53 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > For me even September 1st does not seem too late. Major version up
> > bring users pains including backup/restore application
> > imcompatibilty... IMO to justify those pains we need to give users
> > major enhancements. Honestly I don't understand why we should rush the
> > major version up.
>
> Yeah, I completely agree. I think a feature freeze date of August or
> September is definitely worth considering.

Tatsuo brought up the an excellent point (that I have been saying for a
long time), that the number of must-fix bugs from previous releases is
shrinking, and the complexity of new features is increasing.

This dictates the that length of our release process should lengthen
over time.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-05-01 15:45:20 Re: pg ANY/SOME ambiguity wrt sql standard?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-01 15:16:57 mingw configure failure workaround