| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Basic subtransaction facility |
| Date: | 2004-04-29 20:05:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20040429200533.GH4503@dcc.uchile.cl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:42:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In general I tend to agree with Manfred's point: if you have reason to
> suspect global corruption of a backend's state then you should do FATAL
> (or possibly PANIC). If you do not suspect this then you ought to just
> ERROR. I do not see the use-case for abort-all-levels-of-xact-but-
> don't-exit.
Ok, I'm not wedded to the idea of a new elevel. So you think
elog(ERROR) should rather be elog(FATAL) ?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
Y una voz del caos me habló y me dijo
"Sonríe y sé feliz, podría ser peor".
Y sonreí. Y fui feliz.
Y fue peor.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-04-29 20:08:41 | Re: Basic subtransaction facility |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-04-29 20:04:10 | Re: Basic subtransaction facility |