From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Press Release Party |
Date: | 2004-04-24 19:14:26 |
Message-ID: | 200404242114.27080.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Actually, you are wrong here ... there have been several times where
> core has participated in the creation of a press release without
> discussing it in public first ... first one would probably be back in
> the Great Bridge days ...
The participation in the creation of a press release is not the same
thing as issuing a press release in the name of the PostgreSQL project.
> A Press Release would be a dud if everyone know about it before it
> was released
No, the purpose of a press release is to inform a wider public that does
not normally read the mailing lists. The purpose is not to surprise
your own community.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-04-24 20:30:41 | Re: Press Release Party |
Previous Message | Jordan Henderson | 2004-04-24 19:05:06 | Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL? |