| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_encoding not needed anymore |
| Date: | 2004-04-23 03:50:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200404222350.13887.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 16:54, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> g a data store for many databases, not a single database. But I
> >> think it is far too sanctified by history to change now, just as Ken
> >> Thompson now wishes he had put an 'e' on the end of 'creat' but can't
> >> go back and fix it. Maybe we should think about a symlink/hardlink to
> >> use a better name.
> >
> > initcatalog?
>
> initpgstore ... we can play the name game if people are serious :-)
>
ooh... we havent done this is a while.... hows about....
initpgdata?
dovetails nicely with PGDATA... at least until that gets deprecated ;-)
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-23 03:51:55 | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-23 03:28:46 | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |