Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Mike Mascari <mascarm(at)mascari(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Michael Chaney <mdchaney(at)michaelchaney(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?
Date: 2004-04-22 00:55:08
Message-ID: 20040421215414.Q32445@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Mike Mascari wrote:

> Doesn't sa-learn also require you to teach it Ham as well? My problem
> has been that sa-learn appears to ignore white-listed emails and
> therefore can't learn from 90% of my Ham. Meanwhile, I get spam that
> slips through SA that my Mozilla client *correctly* identifies as Junk.
> Once a week, I take that Junk email, along with all Ham and run sa-learn
> with the appropriate --spam/--ham switch. But it doesn't seem to be
> improving. I still get spam which SA fails to identify but which, 95% of
> the time, Mozilla correctly identifies.

I'm finding it gets better over time ... a few always slip through the
crack, but not near as many today as yesterday ... as for Ham, I have a
mailbox that I save all my 'Answered Emails' to (from friends, lists, etc)
that I periodically run through as --ham

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Pastore 2004-04-22 01:12:27 postgresql idle
Previous Message Development - multi.art.studio 2004-04-22 00:44:10 Re: performance problem aftrer update from 7.1 to 7.4.2