Re: question on forced-killing the postmaster

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: shadowbox(at)punkass(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: question on forced-killing the postmaster
Date: 2004-04-20 16:49:22
Message-ID: 200404201649.i3KGnMe27505@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

shadowbox(at)punkass(dot)com wrote:
> why is it bad to kill -9 the postmaster? any links? i'm wondering why
> is it bad...

The postmaster gets no way to shut down cleanly. It just isn't as good
as using a normal kill and waiting a few seconds. This is true for
killing most unix processes. Use kill -9 only when other kills fail.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2004-04-20 16:58:27 Re: Using SELECT WHERE
Previous Message shadowbox 2004-04-20 07:42:35 question on forced-killing the postmaster