Re: 'begin transaction' new syntax bug?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 'begin transaction' new syntax bug?
Date: 2004-04-20 01:19:20
Message-ID: 200404200119.i3K1JKf01805@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > char *argstring = flatten_set_variable_args(name, args);
> > + printf("bjm: %s %s\n", name, argstring);
> > + fflush(stdout);
> >
>
> Did you really mean to include that? :)

Nope, posted a followup that it was removed in a later commit.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2004-04-20 01:22:28 Re: 'begin transaction' new syntax bug?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-20 01:14:07 Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?