Poor performance of group by query

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Poor performance of group by query
Date: 2004-04-16 15:17:06
Message-ID: 20040416151706.GE87362@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Anyone have any ideas why this query would be so slow?

stats=# explain analyze SELECT work_units, min(raw_rank) AS rank FROM Trank_work_overall GROUP BY work_units;
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HashAggregate (cost=1050.12..1085.98 rows=14347 width=16) (actual time=163149.981..163227.758 rows=17849 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on trank_work_overall (cost=0.00..804.41 rows=49141 width=16) (actual time=0.071..328.682 rows=49091 loops=1)
Total runtime: 163296.212 ms

(3 rows)

stats=# \d Trank_work_overall
Table "pg_temp_1.trank_work_overall"
Column | Type | Modifiers
------------+--------+-----------
raw_rank | bigint |
work_units | bigint |

stats=#

FreeBSD fritz.distributed.net 5.2.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #1:
Wed Apr 7 18:42:52 CDT 2004
root(at)fritz(dot)distributed(dot)net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FRITZ amd64

The machine is a dual opteron with 4G of memory. The query in question
was not hitting the disk at all. PostgreSQL 7.4.2 compiled with -O3.

Also, if I set enable_hashagg = false, it runs in less than a second.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Kratz 2004-04-16 15:28:00 Long running queries degrade performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-16 14:34:49 Re: query slows down with more accurate stats