| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'Ronald Kuczek'" <kuczek(at)kuczek(dot)pl>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_ctl porting |
| Date: | 2004-04-09 14:45:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200404091445.i39EjJ122253@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
>
> > Idea to start postmaster as new console thread is - IMO all except
> > productive solution.
>
> I agree, I'd much rather see the Win32 service functions directly integrated
> with the postmaster.
>
> Perhaps it was not clear from the code I sent you, however that is exactly
> what I had intended (ie. *not* a rewrite of pg_ctl).
FYI, we will rewrite pg_ctl in C anyway in case someone wants to control
PostgreSQL from a script.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ronald Kuczek | 2004-04-09 15:33:03 | Re: pg_ctl porting |
| Previous Message | Richard Sydney-Smith | 2004-04-09 05:56:14 | Integrated Backup Service? |