Re: Function to kill backend

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function to kill backend
Date: 2004-04-06 19:36:35
Message-ID: 200404061936.i36JaZo00654@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce,
>
> > OK, you have a runaway report. You want to stop it. Query cancel is
> > only going to stop the current query, and once you do that the next
> > query is fed in so there is no way to actually stop the report,
> > especially if the report is not being run from the same machine as the
> > server (you can't kill the report process). How do you stop it without
> > SIGTERM? You don't want to shut down the postmaster.
>
> Hmmm ... but, at least in the case of my apps, killing the PG connection
> wouldn't fix things. Most apps I work on are designed to detect connection
> failure and reconnect. I suspect that most platforms that use connection
> pooling are the same. So your case would only work if you actually blocked
> all connections from that host -- not a capability we'd discussed.

I don't think most apps reconnect on disconnect, except maybe pooled
connections where you don't expect your state to be stable between
connections. Certainly most reports can't just reconnect and keep
going.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-06 19:37:37 Re: Function to kill backend
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-06 19:34:57 Re: Function to kill backend