Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
Date: 2004-03-31 22:41:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-sql

> This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
> inquiry.  Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they
> need?  In sufficient detail that we could actually answer?

Ok, talked with him.   They are trying to plan OO-->DB mapping in 3 
programming languages for a large project.   Large enough that they would 
cost out implementing these SQL99 features for us if they like PostgreSQL 
otherwise.    But they *do* need to complete the checklist for each candidate 
database system.

So ... can anyone more familiar with SQL99 than me give some feedback?

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: David CostaDate: 2004-03-31 23:01:49
Subject: Advocacy initiative PHP5/PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Bernard ClementDate: 2004-03-31 21:20:46
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Best open source db poll currently

pgsql-sql by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-03-31 23:49:29
Subject: Re: left join on a view takes significantly more time.
Previous:From: Manuel SugawaraDate: 2004-03-31 18:55:57
Subject: left join on a view takes significantly more time.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group