From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions |
Date: | 2004-03-31 22:41:22 |
Message-ID: | 200403311441.22936.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-sql |
Tom,
> This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious
> inquiry. Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they
> need? In sufficient detail that we could actually answer?
Ok, talked with him. They are trying to plan OO-->DB mapping in 3
programming languages for a large project. Large enough that they would
cost out implementing these SQL99 features for us if they like PostgreSQL
otherwise. But they *do* need to complete the checklist for each candidate
database system.
So ... can anyone more familiar with SQL99 than me give some feedback?
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Costa | 2004-03-31 23:01:49 | Advocacy initiative PHP5/PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bernard Clement | 2004-03-31 21:20:46 | Re: [GENERAL] Best open source db poll currently |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-31 23:49:29 | Re: left join on a view takes significantly more time. |
Previous Message | Manuel Sugawara | 2004-03-31 18:55:57 | left join on a view takes significantly more time. |