Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug?
Date: 2004-03-30 20:13:12
Message-ID: 200403301213.12424.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Robert,

> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2002-11/msg00355.php
>
> Seemed to work though someone else had posted yet another version after
> ours... and in fact the one posted is not exactly what I use now either :-)

Hmmm ... I'd want to do a *lot* of testing before I trusted that approach.
Seems like it could be very vunerable to order-of-exection issues.

I'll start a GUIDE on it, people can post their various Nested Sets solutions.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-03-30 20:59:13 Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-03-30 20:06:08 Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug?