Re: Contrib question

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Contrib question
Date: 2004-03-30 02:59:35
Message-ID: 200403292159.35181.matthew@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Monday 29 March 2004 05:24 pm, Dann Corbit wrote:
> Of course I meant that is contained in "vacuumlo" --> stupid spell

I have never worked with large objects in postgresql and I have no idea what
is different with vacuumlo. Suggestions or thoughts anyone?

Matthew

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Rawnsley 2004-03-30 04:08:25 Re: PG vs MySQL
Previous Message Vadim Tropashko 2004-03-30 02:24:29 Re: self referencing tables/ nested sets etc...