| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alex <alex(at)meerkatsoft(dot)com>, Frank Finner <postgresql(at)finner(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PG vs MySQL |
| Date: | 2004-03-29 18:08:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20040329140719.B51637@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> If you need separate data spaces for each customer but the application
> uses the same schema, use namespaces within a single database.
What does that buy you that doing seperate databases doesn't? Either way,
you have one connection per client, and each connection is still going to
open the same number of files to do their work ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mike Nolan | 2004-03-29 18:35:23 | Re: PG vs MySQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-29 18:06:47 | Re: pl/pgsql perform and execute return wrong values... |