Re: Fuzzy cost comparison to eliminate redundant planning

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Do we know in the optimizer whether we will be needing cheapest startup
> > or not?
>
> No. Higher levels might want either.
>
> > Is the middle one kept because the optimizer has to mix the startup plus
> > some percentage of the total cost for queries using LIMIT?
>
> Right. There are potentially some ranges of LIMIT for which it could
> win, I believe. Maybe with some math you could prove there is no range
> in which the other two don't dominate it, but I suspect the extra logic
> would slow down add_path more than it's worth.

What if we take the total cost and divide it by the number of rows returned ---
then we have a per-row cost for each plan. Then we subtract the two, and
that difference compared to the difference in startup costs tell us how
many rows could potentially use this plan.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073