On Wednesday 24 March 2004 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
> Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> writes:
> > So Tom, are you suggesting:
> > 1. A core in the base distribution (C / SQL)
> > 2. command-line tool in the base distro (pg_advisor)
> > 3. more open project (gborg?) to let people design/add tests, some of
> > which will eventually end up in the standard set in the base distro.
> I'm not suggesting anything ;-). Just pointing out a constraint that
> might affect you guys' choices of where to go with this.
The direction (and it's all Fabien's work so far) will depend on where it will
live. That depends on whether anyone else thinks it's worthwhile.
So howabout some feedback on Fabian's work people?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Garamond||Date: 2004-03-24 19:40:41|
|Subject: Re: subversion vs cvs|
|Previous:||From: Dustin Sallings||Date: 2004-03-24 18:09:08|
|Subject: Re: subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite)|