Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PERFORM] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>,"Subbiah, Stalin" <SSubbiah(at)netopia(dot)com>
Cc: "'pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>,"'pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux
Date: 2004-03-23 16:15:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-performance

> It might be worth considering Apple if you want a 64-bit chip that has a
> clock speed comparable to Intel's - the Xserv is similarly priced to Sun
> V210 (both dual cpu 1U's).

Personally I'd stay *far* away from the XServs until Apple learns to build 
some real server harware.    The current XServs have internal parts more 
appropriate to a Dell desktop (promise controller, low-speed commodity IDE 
drives), than a server.

If Apple has prices these IU desktop machines similar to Sun, then I sense 
doom ahead for the Apple Server Division.

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Phil EndecottDate: 2004-03-23 16:21:39
Subject: Re: Optimisation of INTERSECT expressions
Previous:From: Rosser SchwarzDate: 2004-03-23 16:07:57
Subject: Re: atrocious update performance

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Rob AndersonDate: 2004-03-23 16:41:40
Subject: Testing for existence of a record before insert
Previous:From: Bruno Wolff IIIDate: 2004-03-23 15:53:08
Subject: Re: Slow Foreign Key

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group