Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking

From: Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Date: 2004-03-18 19:18:40
Message-ID: 20040318191840.GA7088@ping.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:50:32PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I'm not sure I believe these numbers at all... my experience is that
> > getting trustworthy disk I/O numbers is *not* easy.
>
> These numbers were reproducable on all the platforms I tested.

It's not because they are reproducable that they mean anything in
the real world.

Kurt

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-18 19:22:10 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Previous Message Michael Adler 2004-03-18 18:52:37 string casting for index usage

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-18 19:22:10 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2004-03-18 19:00:29 Re: syntax error position "CREATE FUNCTION" bug fix