Re: Win32 regression test status

Where are we on this?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Agreed, we don't add them to all joins, but don't we historically add
> > > ORDER BY to queries that are shown to be sensitive to qsort
> > > implementations on various platforms? Are you suggesting we create a
> > > separate regression output file for that platform?
> >
> > I'm not suggesting any particular solution yet, just pointing out that
> > there are reasons to look for alternatives rather than automatically
> > adding ORDER BY.
>
> Doesn't seem to be a consensus here, so:
>
> Tom, I'm happy at looking at whatever alternatives you can suggest.
>
> Bruce, failing the above, I'm happy to check + provide the required ORDER BY
> patch.
>
> Cheers,
> Claudio
>
>
>
> ---
> Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
> For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
> <a
> href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
> ailpolicy.html</a>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073