| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
| Date: | 2004-03-12 18:09:53 |
| Message-ID: | 20040312180953.GA7738@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:24:28 -0500,
Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I don't really care on how its done, but IMO an enterprise class
> database must be able to do log rotation. Logging to Syslog is not an
> option (specially with our verbosity) -- users must be able to use flat
> files for logging.
>
>
> I never seem some many customer complaints and bug reports about a
> single item like the ones we have received here about logging. I think
> this should be the number 1 item in te TODO list.
Are you suggesting the that postgres project develop their own logger
rather than people just using one that has already been developed
by some other group?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-12 18:17:50 | Re: Log rotation |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-03-12 17:28:53 | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |