| From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Date: | 2004-03-12 00:07:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20040312000749.GN39391@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 07:01:47PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Actually, proposal (A) does provide such a separation: notice that the
> projects would go under *.postgresql.net, with the core database remaining
> at *.postgresql.org. I am not sure if that will provoke confusion or
> not, but I think I like it better than pgfoundry because it is clear
> that the domains are related. pgfoundry seems a bit, um, random.
Agree with the last bit, but I really feel that the difference between
postgresql.org and postgresql.net is too subtle--at least for people who
don't work with either very often.
Here's another idea: couldn't we have a subdomain for the projects, as in
"<project>.forge.postgresql.org"? Or would that be too long?
Jeroen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2004-03-12 00:11:11 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-12 00:01:47 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2004-03-12 00:11:11 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-12 00:01:47 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |