| From: | zhuangjifeng <zhuangjifeng(at)263(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | why not ADTs? |
| Date: | 2004-03-11 03:55:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20040311035510.460E01C0EF@smtp.263.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
<html><pre><PRE>Hi,</PRE><PRE>everyone,</PRE><PRE> I am afraid why not make postgreSQL support ADTs such as bag,list and so on.In my</PRE><PRE>mind,all these will make the system more diversiform,aren't they?</PRE><PRE> Thanks!</PRE></pre></html>
==========================
263电子邮件－信赖邮自专业
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| unknown_filename | text/html | 311 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-11 04:06:59 | Timezone support |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-11 02:38:52 | Re: libpq thread safety |