| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ara Anjargolian" <ara(at)jargol(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: C locale |
| Date: | 2004-03-10 07:40:14 |
| Message-ID: | 200403100840.14191.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ara Anjargolian wrote:
> I was just wondering if there is any thought as to what is the best
> approach? By switching from en_US to C locales I can avoid using
> special indexes, but what do I lose?
This is a tradeoff between making your application function correctly
(choosing the correct locale) and some implementation detail that costs
you nearly nothing (creating another index). Let the former drive your
decision.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Frank van Vugt | 2004-03-10 09:16:44 | Re: does this look more like a possible bug or more like a possible hardware problem...? (long) |
| Previous Message | Peter Schuller | 2004-03-10 07:34:51 | Sudden semi-deterministic disconnection between queries |