Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it
Date: 2004-03-07 14:58:47
Message-ID: 20040307145847.GB22118@1
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:40:40PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> Is this fine?
> * Allow a 'connection *' pointer to be specified instead of a string to
> denote a connection.
> ...

I personally have no problem with this as long as it does not break
compatibility to the code we allow now.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2004-03-07 15:28:59 Re: Slony-I makes progress
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2004-03-07 14:46:52 Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it