From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: notice about costly ri checks (2) |
Date: | 2004-03-05 15:38:51 |
Message-ID: | 200403051538.i25FcpM14211@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> > The reason I think we have to mention the constraint name is that you
> > could have a multi-column primary/foreign key, so instead of mentioning
> > each column, we just mention the constraint name, which should be easy
> > to identify.
>
> Sure. See attempt (3). However it is still a "NOTICE".
> Should I make version (4) with a WARNING ?
I can easily make the change before applying the patch.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-03-05 15:41:12 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 |
Previous Message | Oleg Lebedev | 2004-03-05 15:37:16 | Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction |