Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)
Date: 2004-03-05 15:38:51
Message-ID: 200403051538.i25FcpM14211@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> > The reason I think we have to mention the constraint name is that you
> > could have a multi-column primary/foreign key, so instead of mentioning
> > each column, we just mention the constraint name, which should be easy
> > to identify.
>
> Sure. See attempt (3). However it is still a "NOTICE".
> Should I make version (4) with a WARNING ?

I can easily make the change before applying the patch.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-03-05 15:41:12 Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32
Previous Message Oleg Lebedev 2004-03-05 15:37:16 Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction