Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it
Date: 2004-03-03 17:34:20
Message-ID: 200403031734.i23HYKM29474@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net> writes:
> > The reason I posted it because I didn't wanted to work on it if core is not
> > going to accept it on account of non-compliance with spec.
>
> When it comes to ecpg, Michael Meskes is the man you have to convince,
> not any of the core committee.

Michael doesn't own ecpg any more than the core owns the backend code.
I would get an opinion from Michael and see what others think of the
idea. You can always ask for a vote too.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-03 17:36:53 Re: simple make check failures
Previous Message Greg Stark 2004-03-03 17:20:21 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] What's left?