Re: log_line_info

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: log_line_info
Date: 2004-02-29 12:46:33
Message-ID: 200402291346.33678.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Attached is a patch for tagging log lines produced by backends. It is
> not quite ready for application - this is for people to look over and
> play with.
>
> For my testing I used the following settings:
>
> log_connections = true
> log_disconnections = true
> log_line_info = '%T [%P] %U(at)%D(%C:%S) %I line:%L '
> log_statement = true
> log_hostname = true
> log_source_port = true
>
>
> Comments welcome

I'm wondering, why did you choose to use capital letters, when normally
the % codes are lower-case letters when possible? I think lower-case
letters are easier to read.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rob Fielding 2004-02-29 13:08:01 Re: WAL Optimisation - configuration and usage
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-02-29 12:41:10 Re: log_line_info

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-02-29 13:11:04 Re: log_line_info
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-02-29 12:41:10 Re: log_line_info