Re: plperl doc update

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plperl doc update
Date: 2004-02-26 23:17:51
Message-ID: 200402270017.51806.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I thought about that. The docs were pointing to an FAQ number that
> doesn't exit anymore, and there is text indicating sometimes the
> shared compile isn't needed, so I didn't want to hard-code a version
> number in case it wasn't significant aoyway. And if I say newer, it
> will be not-newer in a few years. :-)

If you say "x or newer" then that will be true forever unless they take
it back out. We should also try to figure out a way for people to find
out how their python was compiled rather than making them compile a new
one.

I would prefer to put more effort into giving people a procedure to
follow during PostgreSQL installation to verify the correct setup of
their system, rather than giving them a bunch of options to "try" when
they have unidentified "problems".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-27 00:36:14 Re: plperl doc update
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-02-26 23:06:00 Re: plperl doc update