Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance
Date: 2004-02-27 06:13:02
Message-ID: 200402262213.02089.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Chris,

> Claims of "conformance" are a bit specious when there isn't much of a
> standards body on this anymore. And vendors that consider themselves
> commercially important are quite prepared to ignore standards whenever
> it seems convenient.

Yeah, why do you think they disbanded the compliance team in the first place?
Just ask Joe Celko ....

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-27 06:19:07 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-27 06:10:21 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal