Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-26 18:49:46
Message-ID: 200402261049.46166.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www

Robert,

> Josh, are you still in favor of this move if the larger community does
> not want to move the main project to a gforge based system? or vice
> versa?

Not sure. Depends on what the leads of the associated projects think.
Obviously, if everyone's dead set against it, we won't do it.

However, keep in mind that this is a proposal to *try* migrating to GForge.
We can reverse the process if we decide it's not worth it. That's why I'd
like to start with a few projects at a time.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-02-26 19:00:43 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-02-26 18:45:29 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-26 19:00:04 Re: bgwriter never dies
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-02-26 18:45:29 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-02-26 19:00:43 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-02-26 18:45:29 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeroen T. Vermeulen 2004-02-26 19:00:43 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-02-26 18:45:29 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal