Re: Known issue with Reindex-based corruption?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Known issue with Reindex-based corruption?
Date: 2004-02-26 18:21:01
Message-ID: 200402261021.01505.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom,

> It'd be more productive for them to update to 7.4 ...

It's a distributed app, meaning that they have boxes in the field which can
not be practically updated by remote.

They'll be using 7.4 for *new* boxes, sometime around November. Their
requirements include 6 months of testing before release.

--
-Josh Berkus

______AGLIO DATABASE SOLUTIONS___________________________
Josh Berkus
Complete information technology josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
and data management solutions (415) 565-7293
for law firms, small businesses fax 651-9224
and non-profit organizations. San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel O'Neill 2004-02-27 00:42:52 Optimizer problem with subselect.c?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-02-26 18:05:49 Re: Known issue with Reindex-based corruption?