| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pascal Polleunus <ppo(at)beeznest(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pativo <pativo(at)arcor(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: String manipulation |
| Date: | 2004-02-17 23:42:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200402172342.i1HNgKj24508@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
\Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > I just noticed an unusual affect. GUC regex_flavor affects CHECK
> > constraints even after the check constraint has been created:
>
> Why does that surprise you?
I don't think it is good practice for a CHECK constraint to change its
behavior based on a GUC variable. I am not surprised, but am pointing
out it isn't ideal.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Troy Campano | 2004-02-17 23:59:07 | Re: how to merge a table from another DB |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-02-17 23:35:32 | Re: String manipulation |