Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
Date: 2004-02-12 18:51:51
Message-ID: 200402121851.i1CIppi02396@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >What additional things to we need to deal with if we go the
> >direction of
> >having the environment variables set from the registry and read-only in
> >the process?
>
> I still beleive this way of doing things will be the best. If you want
> it in the system environment, you can use that. If you put it in the
> registry (service specific, for example), that will override those
> settings and be used instead.

I was thinking we can allow the environment to override the registry to
allow multiple postmasters.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-02-12 19:02:15 Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-02-12 18:41:50 Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary