Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Idea about better configuration options for sort memory
Date: 2004-02-12 15:48:58
Message-ID: 200402121548.i1CFmwg23078@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> > > Hmmm ... maybe query_work_mem and maintenance_work_mem, or something
> > > similar?
> >
> > I'll go with these unless someone has another proposal ...
>
> dml_sort_mem and ddl_sort_mem ?

I thought about that, but didn't think DML/DDL was recognized by most
admins.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ow 2004-02-12 15:53:51 Re: 7.4 - FK constraint performance
Previous Message Greg Stark 2004-02-12 15:45:03 Re: Transaction aborts on syntax error.