From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | muteki muteki <muteki_f(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_class and relfilenode |
Date: | 2004-02-12 06:30:54 |
Message-ID: | 20040212063054.GA335@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:08:30PM -0800, muteki muteki wrote:
> And you have pointed out my concern. Even though we have WAL
> enable, we have intentionally disabled both fsync and fdatasync
> inside the kernel because of other reasons. As long as there are
> ways I can eliminate database being corrupted (or correctly and
> automatically detected the corruption and drop the tables if
> necessary), that should satisfy my need.
Well, simple choice. If you don't use fsync or fdatasync then there are no
guarentees for your data. Simple as that. I guess you need to evaluate
exactly how much you value it...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> (... have gone from d-i being barely usable even by its developers
> anywhere, to being about 20% done. Sweet. And the last 80% usually takes
> 20% of the time, too, right?) -- Anthony Towns, debian-devel-announce
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-02-12 06:46:35 | Re: I want to use postresql for this app, but... |
Previous Message | muteki muteki | 2004-02-12 06:22:58 | Re: pg_class and relfilenode |