| From: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint |
| Date: | 2004-02-08 21:54:51 |
| Message-ID: | 20040208215450.GI2608@filer |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Kevin Brown wrote:
>
> > I have no idea whether or not this approach would work in Windows.
>
> The win32 API has ReadFileScatter/WriteFileScatter, which was developed
> to handle these types of problems. These two functions were added for
> the sole purpose of making SQL server run faster. They are always
> asynchronous and are very efficient. Perhaps the win32 port could just
> deal with the synchronization with an eye for future optimizations down
> the line?
The problem with the approach I described on win32 is that fast fork()s
are required for it to not significantly impact the running backends.
That is, fork() has to return quickly when called. I don't know whether
the implementation of fork() under win32 would be fast enough for
this purpose. It might be -- I don't have any experience with fork()
on win32 platforms so I can't say.
--
Kevin Brown kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alex J. Avriette | 2004-02-08 22:41:37 | Re: RFC: Very large scale postgres support |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-02-08 20:14:11 | Re: [HACKERS] dollar quoting |