Re: Compile Vs RPMs

From: Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "pgsql-performance (at) postgresql (dot) org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Compile Vs RPMs
Date: 2004-02-03 23:01:47
Message-ID: 20040203230147.A23912@bacon
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On 03/02/2004 20:58 Anjan Dave wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know whether there are any significant performance
> advantages of compiling (say, 7.4) on your platform (being RH7.3, 8, and
> 9.0, and Fedora especially) versus getting the relevant binaries (rpm)
> from the postgresql site? Hardware is Intel XEON (various speeds, upto
> 2.8GHz, single/dual/quad configuration).

Very unlikely I would have thought. Databases tend to speed-limited by I-O
performance and the amount of RAM available for caching etc. Having said
that, I've only got one machine (the laptop on which I'm writing this
email) which has still got its rpm binaries. My other machines have all
been upgraded from source.

--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for the Smaller
Business |
| Computer Consultants |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2004-02-03 23:34:03 Re: Database conversion woes...
Previous Message Bill Moran 2004-02-03 22:43:08 Re: Compile Vs RPMs