From: | Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Rigmor Ukuhe" <rigmor(dot)ukuhe(at)finestmedia(dot)com> |
Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
Date: | 2004-02-03 15:53:49 |
Message-ID: | 20040203105349.2f700477.threshar@torgo.978.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:02:00 +0200
"Rigmor Ukuhe" <rigmor(dot)ukuhe(at)finestmedia(dot)com> wrote:
> > script [I also decided to use this perl script for testing PG to be
> > fair].
> >
> > For one client mysql simply screamed.
> >
>
> If already have test case set up, you could inform us, from where
> Postgres starts to beat MySql. Because if with 5 clients it still
> "screams" then i would give it a try in case of that kind of
> requirements.
>
I just checked (to see about restarting the innodb test) and it appears
that it'll take a bit of work to get the machine up and running.
I don't have time right now to do further testing.
However, you could try it out.
Not sure at what point it will topple, in my case it didn't matter if it
ran good with 5 clients as I'll always have many more clients than 5.
--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-02-03 16:19:17 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
Previous Message | Rigmor Ukuhe | 2004-02-03 14:02:00 | Re: [PERFORM] MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-02-03 16:19:17 | Re: MySQL+InnoDB vs. PostgreSQL test? |
Previous Message | Kevin Barnard | 2004-02-03 15:34:01 | Re: Increasing number of PG connections. |