Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql)

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: embedded/"serverless" (Re: serverless postgresql)
Date: 2004-01-21 22:31:12
Message-ID: 20040121223112.GA8058@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 11:23:40AM -0700, Rick Gigger wrote:
>
> Yes but sometimes an enterprise level application may need to be put on a
> laptop and taken off-line. Having an embedded database that is compatible
> with the one on the server makes this a bit easier to do.

Why can't you just run a postgres instance for this? What is magic
about "embedded" for this sort of application? Sounds like a clever
wrapper script is all that's necessary for something like that, no?

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
My friend, you can put wheels on your mama but that doesn't make her a bus.
--Joel Spolsky

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-01-21 22:31:17 Re: SCO Extortion
Previous Message lnd 2004-01-21 22:29:19 Lost plpgsql function