Re: Bricolage: Impressive

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>, david(at)kineticode(dot)com, PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Date: 2004-01-19 20:44:49
Message-ID: 20040119164323.C15422@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Marc,
>
> > That isn't an issue, I just need someone to tell me that this is what we
> > should be working on and I'll get it setup over here ...
>
> From my experience, Bricolage needs its own (virtual) server, and preferably
> its own machine. It's not set up to share resources.

k, seperate VM isn't an issue ... but what is it doing that it needs its
own machine? God, I thought Java programs were the worst, you are saying
that this needs more then jakarta-tomcat processes?

David?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-01-19 21:00:47 Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Previous Message Dave Page 2004-01-19 20:34:42 Re: Bricolage: Impressive