Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bricolage: Impressive

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>,david(at)kineticode(dot)com,PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Date: 2004-01-18 05:47:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
David, can you add some input into this?  The thread starts:

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > do we have anyone that is against using this?  Steve seems to
> > indicate that this could be used for not just techdocs, but for the
> > other sites as well ... do we want to look at this too, since Oleg
> > seems to indicate the whole internationalization stuff shouldn't be
> > an issue using it?
> I read that he indicated that internationalization *is* an issue if you
> have lots of languages and frequent, irregular updates.  To me, keeping
> the translations inline seems OK for a couple of languages and small
> sites, but for what we're talking about here it seems shortsighted.

Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2004-01-18 07:23:22
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-01-18 02:56:40
Subject: Re: And now for an example of a different style of

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group