Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bricolage: Impressive

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>,Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>,PostgreSQL Web Development Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bricolage: Impressive
Date: 2004-01-17 22:49:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> do we have anyone that is against using this?  Steve seems to
> indicate that this could be used for not just techdocs, but for the
> other sites as well ... do we want to look at this too, since Oleg
> seems to indicate the whole internationalization stuff shouldn't be
> an issue using it?

I read that he indicated that internationalization *is* an issue if you 
have lots of languages and frequent, irregular updates.  To me, keeping 
the translations inline seems OK for a couple of languages and small 
sites, but for what we're talking about here it seems shortsighted.

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-01-17 22:56:34
Subject: Re: And now for an example of a different style of website
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2004-01-17 22:45:14
Subject: Re: What do we translate? How/When?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group