Re: Max registers in postgresql 7.4

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: "Ruby Deepdelver" <janettedoe(at)hotmail(dot)com>, martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Max registers in postgresql 7.4
Date: 2004-01-16 16:33:31
Message-ID: 200401161633.31089.dev@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Friday 16 January 2004 16:10, Ruby Deepdelver wrote:
> OK boys, i've made a mistake by using the term "register". What i meant is
> "record".
> Could you please tell me if there's a limit in the amount of records that
> the database can handle?
> Thanks... Ruby
> Martin: why do you say i meant tuple?

Tuple, row and record tend to be used interchangeably.

You want this page:
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/limitations.html

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Hall 2004-01-16 16:45:30 Re: check date validity
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-01-16 16:25:38 Re: Max registers in postgresql 7.4