| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Swan <tswan(at)idigx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)myrealbox(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, Lee Kindness <lkindness(at)csl(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: nomenclature |
| Date: | 2004-01-16 16:27:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20040116122455.S13900@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Thomas Swan wrote:
> Perhaps postgresd, postgresqld, or pg_daemon might be a little more
> intuitive?
I think at this late stage in the game (almost 10 years), changing could
be a bit difficult and confusing, no? :) I'd go with something like
pgsqld myself though, keeps it short ... or we could go even shorter with
just pgd ...
But, I'm not, in any stretch of the imagination, advocating for change on
this ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lee Kindness | 2004-01-16 16:35:03 | Re: nomenclature |
| Previous Message | Thomas Swan | 2004-01-16 16:19:14 | Re: nomenclature |