Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary
Date: 2004-01-09 05:38:04
Message-ID: 200401090538.i095c4O18221@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >
> >>As is MySQL. They say you can't produce a non-GPL client that talks to
> >>their server via the protocol. They say they will enforce this via
> >>patents.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> Uhhh perhaps we should verify this first?

I think this does:

http://www.edwardbear.org/serendipity/archives/1193_My_Beef_with_MySQLs_License.html

It includes an analysis from PHP's Sterling saying that MySQL
interpretation that anything that "depends" on MySQL prevents such a
client, and quotes from MySQL's CEO.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Swan 2004-01-09 07:07:24 Re: psql \d option list overloaded
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-01-09 05:19:46 Re: Will Open Source be forced to go Proprietary