Re: A cohesive sales message

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Rob Napier <rob(at)trafficofficemanager(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A cohesive sales message
Date: 2004-01-08 20:47:13
Message-ID: 20040108164359.Q32294@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Absolutely. The posters are easy from a *content* perspective; all
> > it requires is a logo & name and our motto ("The world's most
> > advanced Open Source database"). Aside from the design, our main
> > challenge is deciding how many languages to do posters in.
>
> Once a poster in any language is done, it should be easy to replicate it
> on some other language, I think.
>
> > Ideally, I'd like to find a way to condense things down to two
> > "packages" -- a "geek" and a "non-geek" package.
>
> I think this approach is not ideal.
>
> At the large expositions over here (LinuxTag and LinuxWorld), the crowd
> is very mixed.

Just a point here ... just because we make two distinct packages, doesn't
mean that both packages shouldn't be available at the shows ... nor does
it mean that bits from each package can't be pulled/merged into a "show
package" ... IMHO, we have two camps here ... one that is strong into
"techno-advocacy", and the other into "suit-advocacy" ... each "package"
should be the culmination of that groups work ...

No?

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-01-08 21:30:51 Re: A cohesive sales message
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-01-08 20:38:46 Re: A cohesive sales message