Re: The Tutorial(TM)

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The Tutorial(TM)
Date: 2004-01-08 12:39:37
Message-ID: 20040108123937.GU24788@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:52:29AM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> -On [20040108 07:32], Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:

> >Why?

> Because foreign keys are part of database design 101?

Yes.

Expanding on that, putting FK's in "Advanced Features" gives the (IME
always wrong) impression that they're optional.

Chris Browne, could you give me a pointer to your patch so we don't
step on each other's feet?

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david(at)fetter(dot)org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2004-01-08 13:08:28 Re: The Tutorial(TM)
Previous Message Karel Zak 2004-01-08 12:36:49 ODBC encoding